Someone posted in their YNAB journal (which I’d go find if I could get into the dang board) about using SuperFocus which is the newest iteration of AutoFocus by Mark Forster. I’ve come across it but was always baffled by all the versions and if-this/then-that on his site. (Which is funny since I usually love that stuff.) But since he’s just posted the ‘final’ (ha) SuperFocus rules (he doesn’t call it final, just me) it actually makes sense to me.
I was thinking that I’d just implement it at work and see how it goes. But since work is now over for 10 days (woo!) I’m thinking I’ll give it a go at home. But I don’t want my OF/GTD system to fall into disrepair. So I’ve been reading about how the two do and don’t work together. Here are three great posts (or part of them) from the GTD board on a thread about GTD and Autofocus:
From moises (who I suspect I’ve seen on the mark forster board):
I have taken the position, for a number of months, that a modus vivendi between GTD and AF is possible and desirable. One can do both.
There is one significant change. My NA list is replaced by my AF list. In my case, I have 2 AF lists: home and work.
My project list, which I created many years back when I started GTD, remains fundamentally unchanged. The calendar, tickler, and inbox likewise are unscathed. I still do a weekly review.
My view is that AF does not alter GTD very much. What AF does is give me rules for doing. So AF has a lot of detail in an area (rules for doing) where GTD did not.
My experience has been that the integration of the AF rules into GTD makes work into a game. This game-like aspect of GTD has increased my motivation manyfold.
GTD got me very organized. I like being organized. Being organized is good. AF got me accomplishing a lot more and procrastinating a lot less. I like getting more done. Accomplishing things is good.
From Rainer Burmeister
Currently I have two tweaks for my AF usage:
1) A closed list of next actions (not projects or tasks!), finished and written anew every day, with a workload of maximum 2 hours per day (http://litemind.com/will-do-lists/). This list is for work I have promised to do on that certain day.
2) A Someday list where most of my “dismissed” items go to, reviewed regularly. This list serves the purpose to keep everything that is not current (= this fortnight) off the AF list.
Appointments are written in the calendar, not the AF list, of course.
From ratz
(Here’s the take home paragraph if you are drifting off)
Simple apply most if not all of the techniques of AF to EACH of your context lists separately; read what Mark has to say; take the parts that you are comfortable with and apply them to your context lists. Try as much of the entire technique as you can stomach, the more the better. Just embed it right in your GTD system. Really it fits nicely in the system if you are good at GTD; you don’t have to give up you GTD habits. Oh and nobody but you will know, really we wont’ tell on you.
(End of take home paragraph. Missed it? backup and re-read it)
This makes total sense. I’ve said I work best off a paper list, but I want the historical data and manipulability of a database. I think I like it.



lists